A Lesson in Patience. Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines

Invariably referred to as a ‘cult classic’ for its poor commercial beginnings, Vampire: the Masquerade – Bloodlines was the final nail in the coffin of the fondly-remembered, chronically-overambitious Troika Games, yet it should not have been so and remains one of the greatest ‘what ifs’ of gaming history.

As of September 2013, the Metacritic score for Bloodlines is 80 out of 100 from the critics (with 61 reviews) and a user score of 8.9. Most reviews praise the story, the writing, the voice acting, and the setting – Bloodlines created an awesome world, and the Ocean View Hotel level is hailed as a masterpiece of scripted gaming. Furthermore, every year there are more retrospectives (much like this one) praising and lamenting Bloodlines as equal parts diamond and rough, usually with a glut of comments reinforcing the nostalgia alongside cries to remake the game. This game no doubt has left a substantial mark on a generation of RPG gamers, to the extent where it is almost guaranteed that it will be reinstalled by someone when such an article appears.

Looking back over the history of the game’s development and release, it’s surprising that a game with such scope and so many problems actually achieved the cult classic status that it has. It began development in 2001, beset with problems: it was the first third-party game to use Valve’s Source Engine – which was not yet completed – with Troika developing their own AI to run on it, White Wolf and Activision having to vet everything, and a development team smaller than most, and especially small for the scope they were planning.

In 2004, Activision seemed to want the project over. They brought the game out as soon as was legally possible and, in the process, took the sales-killing decision to release it on the same day as Half-Life 2 (due to a contract with Valve not to release it before theirs). The original plan had been to release Bloodlines in the spring in 2005 to avoid competition with Half-Life 2, Halo 2 and Metal Gear Solid 3, yet Bloodlines was condemned to be out-competed and rushed in a release that lead writer Brian Mitsoda said “felt one step up from being sold at a yard sale.”

The notoriously-overambitious developer was left without an assigned producer from Activision for over a year, meaning that the project went off on tangents and was allowed to bloat. The resulting crunch to meet the new release date must have been like receiving a thousand sit-ups via electrical stimulation in a single minute; a kill or cure remedy. David Mullich, the producer, described it as “a very gruelling project,” while Brian Mitsoda said that the “the worst” part of the game had been its “scope [...] burning me out for a couple of months after the project was over.” Although he did add that, as bad as that was, it was on par with “realizing that, for the rest of your career, you probably won’t get to write anything like Bloodlines.”

With all these problems, the question becomes not ‘how did Bloodlines fail?’ but ‘how did it become so popular in the first instance?’ How did a game so unfinished and so overambitious secure its place in the hearts and minds of so many gamers? Because it was everything other than finished. It may not have had polish, but it had soul; an atmospheric world with great characters and voicing created the perfect feel for the game. While clearly an early commercial failure, I cannot help but feel that commercial success could have come with time as, in all these years, the reviews and popularity has not waned. Even with such glaring flaws, Bloodlines is a success. No doubt the business side of Troika Games had some faults (as Leonard Boyarsky admitted) but the decision of Activision to release Bloodlines some six months earlier than planned was brave at best.

Despite poor initial sales, the game has consistently been sold and even now has a stable presence on digital distribution sites, with Steam still selling it at the inflated price of £15 ($20). It’s clear that Bloodlines created one of the most precious things in gaming – a loyal and nostalgic fanbase. The unofficial patches made by dedicated fans has hit version 8.7 this august – nine years since the game’s original release. The patches have also restored cut and unfinished content, including an entire level of the game and there is even a project underway attempting to port Bloodlines into the latest Source engine. Where else does one see this level of volunteer dedication for something so unfinished?

Bloodlines cries out for a remake, or for a game of similar scope and design to surface again. But what is the lesson of Bloodlines? It is perhaps that most people will forgive such glaring and horrific bugs if coupled with perfect atmosphere and writing. A properly-written game with strong support, such as patches and marketing, could make some serious money for the right publisher if they are willing to be patient. Bloodlines’ continued fan devotion poses a question to me: If it’s been nearly a decade since Bloodlines created such an impact, with a game that had everything except polish, why do we still get games that have the exact opposite problem?




Last five articles by Kris

  

5 Comments

  1. Chris says:

    I thought Dark was a kind of re-make of Bloodlines. Haven’t played it.

  2. Ian says:

    Welcome to the site dude. Nice article – another on the list of games that I really ought to have played by now

  3. Kris says:

    @Chris – I don’t think Dark could be called a spiritual successor of Bloodlines … just skimming some info and youtube clips Dark seems what the combat of Bloodlines might have be like today but that’s all. I haven’t played Dark though so I’ll just be quiet, heh. When I think of Bloodlines I think more of Dues Ex or Fallout.

    @Ian – Thanks sir, nice to be here. :)

    @Both – there’s never been a better time to try it out. Available on steam, new (unofficial) patches rolling out, although I don’t know what version steam patches to or what the level of support is. I fear it might be a struggle for those without the nostalgia factor though. But if you like RPGs and slightly disturbing worlds, I would certainly encourage you to try out this classic if you can.

  4. Toffer says:

    Bloodlines was a superb game. I bought it just after Half Life 2. Played through it a couple of times. Plenty of depth and fun to be had. It’s probably been fixed by now too!

    Great first article dude. Welcome aboard.

  5. Adam B says:

    DARK is bollocks (see: http://www.gaminglives.com/2013/07/19/dark-review/) and really isn’t any kind of RPG at all, it just has the “put points in powers” mechanic that just about everything has these days.

    Bad story, bad characters, linear, very little in the way of player choice in any aspect of it, nothing like Bloodlines really apart from being quite buggy :)

Leave a Comment